Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MANAGE_COMMUNITY_MODERATION'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_META_MODERATE'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_IMMUNE_TO_MODERATION'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_NO_MAXIMUM_POINTS'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_RE_MODERATE'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_RE_META_MODERATE'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_UNLIMITED_MODERATION_VOTES'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE_OWN_COMMENTS'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE_OWN_DISCUSSIONS'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE_AND_META_MODERATE_SAME_COMMENT'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_RE_MODERATE_USERS'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_USER_POINTS'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_OWN_POINTS'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_USER_POINTS_HISTORY'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_OWN_POINTS_HISTORY'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_SEE_UP_VOTES'] = false; $Context->Configuration['CM_PERMISSION_CAN_SEE_DOWN_VOTES'] = false; function CM_Role_DefineRolePermissions(&$Role) { $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MANAGE_COMMUNITY_MODERATION'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_META_MODERATE'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_IMMUNE_TO_MODERATION'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_NO_MAXIMUM_POINTS'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_RE_MODERATE'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_RE_META_MODERATE'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_UNLIMITED_MODERATION_VOTES'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE_OWN_COMMENTS'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE_OWN_DISCUSSIONS'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_MODERATE_AND_META_MODERATE_SAME_COMMENT'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_RE_MODERATE_USERS'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_USER_POINTS'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_OWN_POINTS'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_USER_POINTS_HISTORY'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_VIEW_OWN_POINTS_HISTORY'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_SEE_UP_VOTES'); $Role->AddPermission('CM_PERMISSION_CAN_SEE_DOWN_VOTES'); } $Context->AddToDelegate('Role', 'DefineRolePermissions', 'CM_Role_DefineRolePermissions'); ?> Red Skies | Urban Terror | Forum - Laptop for school.
Not signed in (Sign In)

News

2012-12-03
4.2.008 released!
2012-12-01
Red Skies t-shirt
2012-10-28
4.2.004 released!
2012-10-12
4.2.003 released!
2012-10-03
4.2.002 released!
2012-07-30
Auth system
2012-07-21
4.2 gets release date
2012-05-29
4.2 News
2012-05-14
Member kicked

Vanilla 1.3.0 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Off-Topic: Laptop for school.

Bottom of Page

1 to 10 of 10

  1.  
    •  
      CommentAuthorRocket 
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2008
      0 points
    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=187661822
    Lord, the only thing I'm concerned with on this laptop (except the RPM on HDD) is the fact it is dual core. Wouldn't this be slower than an actual 3.3GHz processor?

    SubJunk - Rocket teh ninja
    •  
      CommentAuthorVai
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2008
      0 points
    not necessarily, Say a processor can only run 1 process millisecond, a dual core can then run two per millisecond, due to the two cores.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSubJunk 
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2008
      0 points
    Yeah dual-core processors are great, I have used and recommended them for about 4 years.

    Runamok: hard to tell if you've hit the crazy dancing guy to be fair
    •  
      CommentAuthorRocket 
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2008
      0 points
    Thanks guys!!

    SubJunk - Rocket teh ninja
    •  
      CommentAuthorDarkSky
    • CommentTimeNov 14th 2008
      0 points
    I recomend duel or quad cores, however don't be confused, it only has x processing speed, ie I have 2.2ghz quad core, this runs slower than a single 3.3ghz cpu. BUT it can run MORE things at once. Making the machine work, and multi task oh so much better.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSubJunk 
    • CommentTimeNov 14th 2008
      0 points
    Well it also depends on your particular CPU and if the maker provides good drivers to simulate multithreading. For example I use an AMD FX series and AMD provides a couple of drivers that allow programs to take advantage of the full speed of the processor. Of course it can never be a full multiple (like, a 2.5GHz dual core will never process a single application faster than a 5GHz single core), but the drivers increase the speed.
    My CPU is 2.6GHz (slightly OCd to 2.8) and my GPU is the latest release, a GeForce 280i by XFX (it is a souped up version of the best consumer video card out) and there is still no bottleneck at the CPU. That is partly because it is an FX series CPUs are crazy performers but it is also because simulated multithreading really does work. There is also the point that a lot of programs feature at least very simple multithreading capability.
    Anyways the short of that is that multi-core CPUs are really great at multitasking like everyone says but they can also perform very well with single applications if they are set up properly

    Runamok: hard to tell if you've hit the crazy dancing guy to be fair
    •  
      CommentAuthorkhaotik_lord 
    • CommentTimeNov 15th 2008 edited
      0 points
    lol hell yea at work ive seen a intel p4 3.2ghz (single core) pc run vista and also ive seen a intel dual core 2.0ghz running same copy of windows vista. and shit man.. the dual core loaded the menus up no delay no slight pause just about crapped myself on the speed of this beast of a pc i didnt wanna give it to the lady that bought it haha.

    oh and yes, the speed of the hdd does matter between a 5400rpm and 7200rpm, less noise and faster access.. good to make sure its got a bit of cache on the drive as well. seek times etc, and ide or sata (all shud be sata now days!) lol. (they might not give you that info) but you gota watch out on laptops, they will budge out somewhere to make it look pretty and not say. ie the hdd's being 5400rpm (bottleneck would be here in this case).. but if you dont care and it works fine.. then by all means :)
    •  
      CommentAuthorVai
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2008
      0 points
    Go for the Old Raptor HDDs, 10,000 rpm, :D


    However, shite storage: 80ish GBs
    •  
      CommentAuthorSubJunk 
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2008
      0 points
    Yeah for sure, I use a 150GB Raptor for C: and it really makes an impact on everything.

    Runamok: hard to tell if you've hit the crazy dancing guy to be fair
    •  
      CommentAuthorElScorcho 
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2008
      0 points
    other than th chipset graphics, which you probably cant upgrade, and the slowish hdd rpm looks like a pretty sweet deal. keep in mind 45nm cpu's (T7**** ? i think) are spreading faster and there's a new pure 45nm line up coming out shortly, bigger capacities less power and heat... th T5550 is 65nm and you can get very similar lappies for less than $1200 in aus

1 to 10 of 10

  1.  
Back to Discussions Top of Page